🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to enact a law lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," stated the parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the family of a young person who was lost after encountering harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this global debate evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.