🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked broad protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the president could potentially send back the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect similar debates in additional EU countries